The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Let's agree to disagree!!!! I owned the Bond and now the 2254.50. Both are great bracelets all coming down to a matter of personal choice. Both equally as comfy ...to me anyway. I personnaly agree with Keith on the 2254.50 that it looks more sporty with the speedy style..
Enjoy,
JimC
: I think it is a styling thing...in my opinion,
: the Bond bracelet is too much- it takes away
: from the beauty of the watch by attracting
: your eye to the shiny, large Bond bracelet.
: The Speedy bracelet is just a more classic
: look.
: Chris
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |