The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: That's one of the reasons I'm hesitent on
: buying a SMP again. Omega keeps changing
: models out, so down the road, vintage parts
: get more difficult to come by.
That is just personal conjecture -- a form of misinformation that is a common result of people with insufficient information GUESSING at possible problems based on shallow analyses of superficial knowledge. I spend a lot of my time fighting just this kind of misinformation. People 'deduce' possible problems, then state them as fact, others read it and take it as fact. But such information is often misleading if not downright incorrect.
Fact is, OMEGA keeps an excellent supply of replacement parts. This is particularly easy as they share cases, movements and bracelets across multipe models, so the range of parts needed to fix current models 20 years in the future will be far better than the inventory available now to fix watches from 20 years ago.
: Rolex puts new movements into watches without
: drastically changing models, why can't
That's a further misconception. Even Rolex makes subtle changes to cases, crystals, bracelets and other pieces that prevent parts from being interchangable across many model years. So it is false thinking that not 'drastically changing' the overall appearance for several decades means greater availability of replacement parts.
I don't expect any problems with getting parts in the future for watches bought today of either brand to be an issue. Certainly there is no evidence that either OMEGA or ROLEX are better or worse prepared to meet parts needs in decades to come.
: it may be boring to some, but that's part of
: why Rolex has a following.
It is also why Rolex has some damn good competition from brands like OMEGA that are not so heavily stuck relying on design successes from decades ago as the best they have to offer today.
Just like they said in the old car rental ads: "We're #2, so we try harder!"
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |