The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
There is no way that a automatic watch, even the certified chronometers can beat the accuracy of a quartz. Don't mistaken me, I have a SM 120M chronometer version myself. I just want to be fair.
The new Seiko Perpetual Calendar watch series has a differential of less than 20 secs. a year. Back in the Eighties, Seiko had some twin-quartz models that would gain/loss less than 5 secs. a year!
I have a automatic watch because of many reasons that was mentioned in this and other threads of the forum, mainly for the passion for a Swiss Ceritified Automatic Chronometer.
Another problem was the concern of battery leaking and changing. I had a couple good watches (Baume & Mercier, etc.)that were ruined by the acid leakage of the battery. But now, Seiko has some models that use lithium batteries, which make the watches run for 10 years :)
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |