The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I just bought a gorgeous Seamaster in titanium, three months old. The past owner had a reputable jeweler remove the back to verify the #1120 caliber movement. The issue is that I noticed a small speck of dust on the inside of the crystal. Is it worth pulling the watch apart to remove that speck of dust? It has also been suggested to me that the seals are in need of replacement and may be the cause of the dust? I feel that the dust was from the breif inspection of the movement and not as a result of a poor seal. Should I spend the money to remove the speck of dust? Is it possible that the seals allowed this dust through on such a young (3 mos old) watch? Please comment.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |