The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Co-axial visibility
In Response To: Re: Co-axial visibility ()

: I did. Your Aqua Terra review on your website
: says: "Finally, since the movement is
: viewable via a sapphire display back, Omega
: has stepped up the finishing of the movement
: over the 1120."

: So which is it? Are they the same or does the
: 2500 have finer finishing than the 1120?

Actually, I pointed you to look at the PICTURES I have of the caliber 2500 via the display back in my AT, as well as the movement pictures I have of the 1120 in each of my Seamaster reviews.

But you've pointed out a significant error in my AT review, but one that is easily explained. At the time I wrote my AT review, I had not yet had the opportunity to open the case on a Seamaster Pro, and visually inspect an 1120. However, in researching the article, I came across information which seemed to point to the 2500 being better finished than the 1120.

Made sense right? No Seamaster Pro has a display back, so why have a finely finished movement? Well, if you examine the pictures I reference above, you'll see both movements have the same exact Geneva stripes, waves, and perlage applied on the rotor and bridge work respectively.

I had actually forgotten about that particular statement in the review, so I'm thankful that you've pointed out the error.

John

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE