I never expected anyone to know all the brands. However the reason I pointed out is because I feel you look down upon something you have not heard. If I have never heard of the watch or a brand I don't have to write ot down as if because I don't know this brand then this brand is not worth looking or examining. Hope you get that point because apparently you don't from your reply.
But lets put that behind us and thank you for your posts. Personally and I believe most people in this forum owns an omega. It is in an article in chronocentric to compare omega to rolex. Not only it is compared but its is a conclusion somewhere that rolex is over priced for what they are really worth and omega seems to be the perfect balance between price/proformance/look ratio or for whatever reason why you think omega is great.
I love my omega but if I could get it even cheaper then I am sure no one will mind that? Paying primum for something is never really my style nor do I believe it is most others peoples objective to pay as much as possible.
Only two days ago I looked into Marcello C and it intrigued me. If something is as good as omega then I would definitly love to own one. Because it is cheaper then I can wear the watch even more carelessly unlike now. Not only that if this marcello c is as good as omega then we are paying more then we bargained for. Just like we chose omega over rolex. Hope you understand my point and why I want to know about the difference of the movments.
