The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Yes I do agree Marcello C look a lot like Rolex
: but if you know there are others out there
: that have the same qualities and with
: cheaper brands than marcello c, then can you
: can please list some here?
Check out some of the watches at westcoastime.com. They carry brands that look like ROLEX, use ETA movements and cost hundreds less than the MarcelloC.
: Reason for that is because most watch
: manufacturers know women don't care about
: the movments wether they are automatic or
: quatz, they only want something that looks
: good and something expensive and ofcourse
: the famous brands.
Right. Ever notice that most ladies watches don't even have second hands!
: You keep saying movment doesn't matter. But the
: thing about watch is all about movment and
: then the look and then probably the quality
: of the materials used and funtionality of
: it.
No, what I am saying is that any premium watch is going to have a more than sufficiently great movement -- whether it is ROLEX, OMEGA or anything by or based on ETA. Mechanical watch movements that tell time and date are 100-year old technology. This is not something that is hard to master or that some premium watch companies are still trying to get right. So it is a waste of time trying to seek significant differences between these two movements -- there aren't any. Unless you wish to find miniscule details and fool yourself into believing they are important, you are on a pointless quest here. As I said before, they are close cousins made by the same company.
: So why did we and all of us here choose omega?
: Because omega is just a brand? I don't believe
: so. We like our watch to have chronometer
: why? Because we want our watch to be as
: accurate as possible.
No, if that's what we wanted, we would have chosen QUARTZ, not mechanical. Obviously, there are intangibles beyond technical accuracy.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |