The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I haven't posted here before, but I've been lurking here for a little bit... Finally bought the ever so popular 2531.50.00 and I can't stop fawning over it. I've taken countless pictures, but haven't we all seen enough :>
Just saw some interesting kid counts, and thought I'd jump in. My wife and I just had twins which puts our count at 5. Long days are the norm tho huh? I get up at 5am and usually get to bed sometime between 11 and 1am. I'm a night person, but that 1.5 hours of SILENCE in the morning is worth getting up for! Thanks to all for such an informative forum, and thanks to Derek for such a great site.
Anyways, DOMED CRYSTAL... I typically am pretty rough with just about everything that I buy, and a watch is no exception. I too was concerned about the crystal being domed. Mine has so far,(3 WHOLE weeks!), held up very well. From what I can gather, the crystal is actually made from a polished chunk of synthetic (man-made) saphire. If this is the case, it should be incredibly scratch resistant.A true scratch should only come from a material with a moh's hardness of 9 or greater (diamond is 10). Chipping is a different matter though, and CAN happen from impacts with materials with a lower moh's hardness.
Like I said, I THINK this is the case. Someone please let me know if I am wrong :>
Sorry for the lemgth.
Robert
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |