The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I GOTTA GET THIS OUT OF MY SYSTEM, HOW CAN PEOPLE CLAIM THEY HAVE A GENUINE 1954(say),SEAMASTER, THAT LOOKS CLEANER & MORE PRISTINE THAN A WATCH THAT WAS BOUGHT A WEEK AGO! THEY MUST HAVE NEW FACES,HANDS,WINDERS.etc. WHAT IS THE POINT OF BUYING A VINTAGE WATCH ERGO A WATCH WITH SOME 'HISTORY'& A PAST, IF THE BLOODY THING IS A COBLED TOGETHER WATCH JUST OFF THE WORK-BENCH! OH THE SELLER SAY'S 'FULL OMEGA GARENTEE......BOLLOCKS, OMEGA AS WE ALL KNOW, WONT SANCTION SELLING WATCHES ON THE INTERNET! IF I'M WRONG ON THESE COUNTS CAN SOMEONE PUT ME STRAIGHT, 'CAUSE I'M FED UP OF SEEING S***** RED FACED' 54 SEAMASTERS, THE COLOUR IS SO OBVIOUSLY NEWLY PAINTED AND A CHEAP QUALITY FINISH TO BOOT. COME ON, LETS SHOW THESE CON-ARTISTS THAT WE REALLY AR'NT 'THAT STUPID'........ARE WE?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |