The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

I don't know that anyone here can claim it fake
In Response To: Fake? *LINK* ()

Here's a picture of the real one, taken from an old catalog I have. It's actually model 2498.20.00. Omega often made 2 versions of two tone watches, one with a 18k/ss (model 2398.20.00) bracelet, and one with just the ss bracelet.

I believe the markers are just aged, but I'm curious whey the markers look so aged and the lume in the hands doesn't.

On the watch for sale, I can't see any gold rings around the sub-dials, while the catalog picture clearly show it. Also, the watch for sale seems to show a black frame around the date aperture when, in fact, it's gold.

I'm not ready to declare the watch for sale as a fake, but I would not purchase a watch I didn't Know was authentic. I think this watch raises enough questions for a buyer to ask for more proof of authenticity.

I think we have to be careful about claiming a watch fake when we are not 100% sure. It could unfairly hinder the sale of a possibly legitamate watch, when people don't have all the facts. IF this one is fake, it's a very very good fake, and warrants further investigation, probably unavailable to us.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE