The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I have already tried and I have my own numbers!
: I wanted to know about others SMP test results
: so I can compare.
That makes sense. Sorry, I didn't understand.
I don't have a mechanical SMP...yet. Though I plan to acquire one in the near future. When I do, I'll send you the results I get.
I have personally seen two watches with identical movements that behave differently. One would run faster dial up, and the other crown up. It would seem that there are more at work influencing the timing than just gravity. Then forces excerted on the balance shaft by the hairspring are different from movement to movement (even the same type.) Just the hairspring alone has an incredible number of variables influencing it.
That being said, I am also kind of curious what positional error others measured in their Omega.
Disclaimer: I am no expert. Please feel free to correct me, or add your comments to the discussion.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |