The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Right, I saw that in that great article you posted. I believe it said they will have screw-in casebacks to allow for the higher (600M) depth rating. What I was trying to say was that the sapphire caseback on the current Bond GMT model is more costly than a generic steel caseback, so the Planet Oceans (with steel casebacks) may not be priced much higher than the Bond GMT. My "logic" is that both watches have the same movement but the Bond GMT has the GMT feature and a sapphire caseback, which the PO's do not. However, the PO's do have a new bracelet and a higher depth rating that the Bond GMT lacks. Of course, it's all just guesswork until we get real numbers from Omega.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |