The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I definitely wouldn't say that the Seamaster is more robust. If anything, the movement in the Speedmaster is more robust, being manual wind. It can withstand some abuse, based on the NASA tests. I dropped mine onto a tile floor from a height of about 4 feet. It was a horrible feeling. But the watch just shrugged it off as if nothing had happened and continued to run at +4 to 5 seconds per day.
The two main advantages to the Seamaster over the Speedmaster are the price and the greater water resistance. If you want to swim with your watch, the Seamaster is the obvious choice. And of course which one you think looks better on your wrist is something to consider. For me, the Speedmaster looks better.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |