The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I hear ya...If I wanted a Rolex I would have gotten one. I went with the AT for a few reasons.
1) Prefer the look of the AT to the DJ. Hands and back
2) Like the price when compared to Rolex
3) Didn't want the bling factor and "check me out I'm a rich a-hole" factor that come's with a Rolex
4)Like the idea of the co-ax though this is prob and intangible. Both mvments keep time right.
: You won't get any questions about your watch.
: I've had my AT for a year now, and the only
: person to make an unsolicited comment on my
: watch was a coworker who noticed in a
: meeting that it was a nice watch, and that
: it was an Omega. She apparently knew the
: brand and was very impressed. Otherwise,
: nobody notices....and I like it like that to
: some extent. If too many people notice, then
: you know that the wrong people will notice.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |