The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Why Omega has such horrible marketing policies

I am no watch expert either, although I am beginning to become a collector.

I have had a Seamaster Professional the one known as James Bond model for a year now. It is a model that has stayed the same for over ten years now. Should You want a model that has stayed the same for long time, I guess You could have gone for the "Moon watch".

My perception of Omega product line is that they - unlike e.g. IWC - keep some models in production for a long time, while others change and new ones are introduced.

I got the Omega SMP because I liked it. Not buying it directly when I first saw it I was happy to trust it being available till I had made my decision. The only downside for me has been that in general public Omega is so well known as a "luxury" watch. This is though exactly what some people buing Rolexes are after. That is a good reason for me to purchase a Rolex, is is perceived even more than Omega as a "luxury" watch. Also I have read some alarming stories of the quality - the low level of it - on some of the run of the mill Rolexes. Third, a comparable Rolex is twice as expensive as an Omega and 700 000 Rolexes produced every year the image of that watch to me is simply the image of a greedy cash grabber. I would not like to be identified as such wearing one of those on my wrist.

My next more expensive purchase will probably be an IWC. Till that I will wear the SMP or less conspicuous, less expensive, but even more stylish 40 year old Seamaster 600.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE