The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I think it is over priced too, considering the additional features over the standard SMP at $1995 retail. Maybe $400-$500 over the standard SMP would have been justified, but not $1200. I feel that the Bond GMT co-ax is a more interesting and attractive watch than the Planet Ocean.
By the way they are pricing these watches, it would seem that we will never see a standard SMP 300 co-axial model. That would be a sweet watch in my opinion!(with applied markers of course)
For about the same money as the Planet Ocean, I would rather have the SMP chronograph. The movements in the SMP series are rock solid and I cant justify the additional cost for the Planet Ocean.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |