The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Well, the watch went from losing 72 seconds per
: day to gaining 1 second per day. I kid you
: NOT! I have time tested the watch for
: several days and it is keeping consistent
: time. The movement is 550 calibre, which is
: fine rated but definitely not chronometer
: rated.
: How is this possible? According to the
: Chronocentric documentation, my watch is on
: par with a modern day certified chronometer!
Why do you think it is impossible? +/-1 second a day for any mechanical is great but not unbelievable.
Also, remember a Chronometer status is merely an extra perforamnce test that some watches are submitted for. Watches aren't built differently for it. Most modern watches should be able to run well withing Chronometer specs if adjusted by a competent professional.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |