The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I'm not sure it's a good thing such a change (quite different affair than changing hands style :) ), and definitely I don't think it's a good idea to "reuse" a bracelet born for a completely different line of watches (imo it's not important here if the new watches look beautiful or not,in fact I like them). In the last months I've been trying to decide which SM was better for me, now that the collection is virtually splitted in two so different styles I feel very confused. I've always appreciated the pros of progressive evolution (opposed to, for ex., Rolex "never change a thing" attitude), but I thing probably this is a bit too much...
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |