The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I asked the same question to a luxury watch store repair-man several months ago. He told me that although there is some wear and tear to some parts of the watch, it supposedly is still better to keep an automatic watch running continuously.
It would be interesting to know Derek's , or Richard's opinion regarding this.
Common man
: I've heard of some people owning an automatic
: mechanical watch and after having left it in
: a drawer for over a decade, wind it up and
: discover that it still keeps reasonably
: accurate time.
: So my question is this: does giving the watch
: movement long "rests" help extend
: the life of the components? Or is it better
: to keep the movement going contiguously,
: either by wearing it all the time or using
: an automatic watch winder?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |