zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Is a Full Rotor much more desirable than a Bumper?

I've read up on vintage Omega movements and understand the basic differences in the principles of full rotor vs. bumper. Clearly, the full rotor is more efficient at self-winding. But I wonder if there are any other advantages to the full rotor?

Does the full rotor require less maintenance than a bumper automatic? If so, by what degree?

Will a full rotor remain "accurate" longer than a bumper automatic? What I mean is, after a year or so of use will the full rotor lose/gain fewer seconds than a bumper, or is it negligible?

How does a bumper automatic of 354 caliber (I've heard it to be the best of the bumpers) compare to a full rotor movement, in terms of sustained accuracy and maintenance requirements?

~Omegary

Messages In This Thread

Is a Full Rotor much more desirable than a Bumper?

Re: Is a Full Rotor much more desirable than a Bum

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

1 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr + 0.02 sys = 0.18 CPU)