| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
| For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Hi again, folks! As I posted on the last topic, I got (bought, not free =)) 3510.50 (reduced) from my friend. I have one more curiosity about minute and second (small circle) arms, which I just found out this evening. Maybe I am just paranoiac but this evening I tried to make the minute arm be exactly at the number position (i.e. at 0sec, the minute must be at the number or at 30sec, it must be exactly between two numbers). The best I could do now is the minute arm is precisely at number position when sec arm is at 5 sec. But here comes my doubt.
I finished calibrating the omega at 8pm but then at 11pm I observed my omega again. The minute arm changes its position! I mean the minute is precisely at number position when sec is at 20, not 5 anymore. Any guess what? Now it is at 5 again, not 20. Hmm.. This might be a stupid question, and for that I am sorry. =P But can anyone explain me whether it is normal for this 3220 type? Many thanks for all of your sharing opinions! ;)
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |