The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I wonder the same. You started the thread about
AR coating on the PO crystal and the discussion
progressed on grade of steel!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyway I try to stick to the original topic.
IMO it's a bad decision Omega made to add AR coating on the outtside of PO crystal. Today I checked at a local
AD and confirmed it. I saw the blue hue created
by AR coating. AR coating always get scratched.
I've a Sinn 656 and it has few hairline scratches
on the crystal due to AR coating. But good news is
you can remove AR coating by rubbing the crystal. Perhaps brasso or some abrasive work well. I'm not sure which one but I read people did it.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |