The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Actually, if you watch the video on Breitling's
: website, you'll see that their caliber 13
: movement used in the Chronomat is a VERY
: heavily modified ETA movement.
Yes, a Valjoux 7750 (chronograph) with rhodium finish -- in Breitling's implementation, they are very accurate.
The common movement in Breitling non-chrono's is calibre 17 -- a rhodium plated ETA 2824-2. It is very well finished. I do not know of any funtional modifications, not sure if it needs any. The models with these mocements are very thick. The Omega 1120 is a different story -- Omega obviously wanted to have a flatter movement, so had to go with the ETA 2892-A2 and had to redesign the rotor, etc, and at the same time had to ensure its ruggedness.
If there is a premium on flatness, then Omega wins hands down here; otherwise, the movements (Omega cal. 1120 vs Breitling cal. 17) are probably about equal in functionality, reliablity and precision.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |