The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Opinions on Omega 1120???
In Response To: Re: Opinions on Omega 1120??? ()

: IWC fans claim that IWC "heavily"
: modifies its ETA 2892's also. I'm not sure
: what the differnces are (the nivirox
: hairspring and the finishings noted appear
: common in higher end watches). But my
: question is this: Presumably Omega made
: improvements to the winding system because
: it wished to use a different rotor -- if so,
: then the real question is why did Omega
: change the rotor? -- I can only think of two
: reasons: - to keep the movement as flat as
: possible
: - to make it as rugged as the 2824

: The improved winding efficiency doesn't appear
: to manifest itself in terms of better power
: reserve over that of Breitling or IWC.
Ther are two categories of nivarox far hairsprings 1 & 2. Omega uses the second. IWC just give a yellow gold finish to their watches and submit their movements to isochronic tests and they are adjusted to run only from 0 to +7 sec per day.
I don't think it is a question of flatness of the movement. Omega changed the rotor in order to gives a maximal efficiency during winding this allowing the hairspring to be consistently armed.
The power reserve of the 1120 is 44 hours against 42 hours for the breitling cal 17 and teh iwc version of the eta 2892.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE