: Did I agress you? No. I am not a rolex dealer.
: I am just here to debate. I have always been
: polite and courteous.
: My assertions about rolex?
: I will give you links that confirm what I said
: about Rolex quality
:
: http://people.timezone.com/mdisher/andrewb/3135/3135_1.htm
:
: http://people.timezone.com/msandler/Articles/ZbindenRolex/Rolex1.html
:
: http://bjsonline.com/watches/articles/0014.shtml
:
: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/chronomania/Articles/Calibres_daytona/les_calibres_dayto_cyr.html
: I am wondering which litterature or magazine
: you have been reading but my uncle wears a
: 1971 seadweller that was service once in 34
: years and never had a problem. My watchmaker
: wears a 1948 oyster perpetual, its precison
: is +2 sec per day.
: Rolex has a very very strict quality controls,
: you can't like rolex that is your problem
: but don't try to say that their movements
: are bad quality when it is not the case.
: The litterature like watchtime is mainly
: written by people who are more into
: marketing than serious watchmaking. I
: clearly remember the article of the
: chronomat evolution vs omega speedmaster.
: The lemania 1873 is a better movement than
: the valjoux 7750. The press has a focus to
: sell a product, the watchmaker has a focus
: to explain you clearly what is better
: quality or not.
: The micro stella balance wheel has made its
: proof since 1977 and is still a reference
: today, how can you explain then if according
: to your logic that some people who own
: rolexes haven't tehir serviced their watches
: since 15 years?
: Incredible statements? No. Ask any watchmaker
: what is the reference in terms of absolute
: robustness in terms of automatic movements,
: you will get the same answer: rolex 3135 and
: same is for chronographs: rolex 4130.
AND REMEMBER! It was Omega Speedy that went to the moon and is still FLIGHT QUALIFIED by NASA---NOT ROLEX!!!
