The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Here is my most recent purchase, Omega SM 300
: 165.024. This watch has had extensive work
: performed on it with all original Omega
: parts used. It is in flawless condition and
: looks at it did back in the early 1960's
: when new. I am very excited. I would like
: opinions as to collectability and future
: investment potential of this watch if kept
: in near-mint condition for years to come.
:
: Thank you for reading,
: Brady
You know that there were and are a lot of fakes on the bay, 9/10 seamaster 300 for sale on teh bay are fake and their movement is far to be NOS. A 1965-1969 seamaster 300 non date has a 552 and a seamster 300 with date has a 565 both calibers with 24 jewels, if it is not the case then the watch is a franken.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |