The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: sounds a little like EGO here, when i thought i
: couldn't live without a ROLEX and then a
: Patek back in 1982,and moving forward a
: couple Omega's. Moral of this is i won't
: take a loss on the ROLEX or Patek, but would
: on the Omega's..
WRONG! First of all you've got Rolex and Patek in the same category---you're way off on that one buddy! Rolex IS in the same category as OMEGA. While Rolexes do have a slightly higher resale value, it doesen't it mean that Omegas are bad investment. Nonetheless, all luxury watches are usually bad in terms of money investments anyway.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |