The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: i received a email stating that omega was equal
: to rolex? maybe so, but why does rolex use
: the a grade above omega in their steel? any
: watch experts on this board, lets have a
: vote as to the 10 best watches in the world
: and their ranking as to workmanship and
: materials used.
I don't think it is correct to think of the steel that Rolex as being " a grade above" Omega's steel. Rolex's steel is more expensive. Each alloy represents a complex package of properties some of which aren't relevant at all to what you want. For example, are you really concerned about intergranular corrosion after welding? That's what 316L is good at. How about corrosion resistance in hot acids? Most of us don't dip our wrists in such things. I think more has been made of than needs to be.
Regards,
Manuel
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |