The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: rolex uses a microstella adj. system rather
: than a regulator like omega?patek uses the
: same system as rolex. very superior form of
: regulation. rolex will barely depreciate and
: will never lose even close to half it's
: value. i own both and it really doesn't
: matter. pure fact is rolex is better.
The Microstella is also adjustable in height something the Gyromax isn't.The Gyromax system is too fragile to be compared to the Rolex system.I think the fact taht Rolex has an inhouse movement makes of it something highly appreciated. Omega probably uses Eta as bases of their calibres but they are probably the best one who modifies the eta 2892-2. It is the only worthy competitor of the rolex 3135 on the market alongwith the frederic piguet 1150 and lemania 8810.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |