The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Does all of this really matter? Isn't what is important is whether the watch is good. Is it well made? Is it accurate? Will it last? etc. I think that with all of the components being made in house there was a historical assuption that the increased control would somehow translate into quality. But that itn't necessarily true. In house components could be great or they might not be. I think the key question is whether the current omegas are accurate, durable, etc.
A final counter example: I've been looking at digital cameras and noted that the Sony has a Zeiss (!!!) lens. I assume that means the lens is really good which is of course the goal. However, should I be disappointed that Sony is not manufacturing all of the components in house? I don't think so.
I think that keeping your eye in the essential issue is to ask for an assessment of the quality of the watch not how much outsourcing they do.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |