The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: both by reading through all of these posts and
: by talking to my local watchmaker at the
: local Omega AD. I agree with Sam's synopsis
: - whether the movements are made by ETA or
: by Omega directly doesn't affect how much I
: love my watches. The issue I had was that I
: felt that I, as a consumer, was being misled
: by being told that "Omega does this and
: that to modify their movements". It
: clearly gives the reader of magazine and
: internet articles the impression that Omega
: is modifying their own movements, not having
: ETA do it for them. I can honestly say that
: up until a few days ago when I read through
: the timezone thread I had NO IDEA that ETA
: was making entire movements to Omega's
: specifications.
: Nevertheless, my watchmaker informed me that
: the modifications that are done to ETA
: movements for Omega are extensive and do
: result in what would practically amount to
: "in-house" movements (most notably
: the co-axial). As Georges Z. pointed out
: earlier, my watchmaker noted that Breitling
: tends to do only very minor modifications to
: base ETA movements. Breitling buys ETA
: movements and does the modifications
: in-house, but their modifications are
: minimal compared to the extensive
: modifications Omega requires ETA to do on
: all of their movements. So, if the
: "in-house is better theory" were
: true, the Breitling in-house modified
: movements would be better, but they are not.
: I also found it interesting that my
: watchmaker is a certified Breitling trained
: watchmaker, yet he gives Omega movements
: much higher marks. He sells both brands in
: his store.
: Just as an added FYI, he gave the highest
: praise to the co-axial movement overall and
: to the Moon Watch's chronograph movement.
: Anyway, it was a real education. I think it's
: great that there are so many knowledgeable
: people on this forum who seem to know as
: much about movements as professional
: watchmakers. I keep learning the more I
: read.
Now you see the reason why I enjoy talking movements that much.The movement in the speedy pro is the same since late 1968 based on the lemania 1873 probably the highest grade cam operated chrono movement available on the market.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |