The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I was recently reading a side by side comparison review of the Bond Seamaster 300 vs. the Rolex Submariner. There are many such reviews out there but this particular one seemed very unbiased and interesting. Anyway, when it got to the part of comparing bezels, the reviewer noted that the Bond bezel has a significant amount of play due to the up and down movement in it's racheting system. Apparently, the Submariner is smooth and does not exhibit any play.
Sure enough, I picked up my Bond Seamaster GMT CoAx and pressed lightly down on the bezel and found it does have very slight up and down play or movement. Not side to side but only if pressed horizontaly at about the 45 sec position. Also, there is really no play when rotating in its unidirection. Is this a defect that should be checked or is it something that is just characteristic of the bezel system?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |