The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
My friend just sold me an Omega Seamaster Professional Chronometer (James Bond Model). What a beauty this watch is!!! It was just purchased by my friend last November 1998, so it is fairly very new. The watch has never been serviced or tampered.
I noticed the watch has been going fast by approximately 40-50 sec/day, if I wear it while sleeping it only advances around 30-35 seconds a day. This is the first time I have purchased a chronometer, and I enjoy the watch because of the marvelous sound it produces (the classic tick of a chronometer) but I dislike it because of its inaccuracy in timekeeping compared with a quartz watch.
Is this inaccuracy normal? Considering most chronometers can be used for many years and even a lifetime, is servicing this seamaster already needed considering it is only 1.5 years old?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |