The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: The term "chronometer grade" would be
: a more accurate description of the 562. Keep
: in mind that just because the movement
: wasn't sent in for certification, it doesn't
: mean that it cannot perform within COSC
: specs.
: The Rolex Submariner 14060M (no date) with the
: cal. 3130 is not a certified chronometer but
: it keeps as good or better time as it's
: brothers.
: I don't know about the older vintage models but
: I believe now the watch can only be marked
: with the word "chronometer" only
: if it went through COSC.
Thanks for responding. So is it a safe assumption that if the movement had been actually certified by COSC, it would have been marked as such by Omega?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |