The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: The two things that allowed Omega two wins with
: the speedy was: -a very solid case and
: highly resisting to shock plexiglass
: -a legendary movement which established its
: superiority by proving its great
: robustness,accuracy,reliability and
: smoothness: the 321. The valjoux
: 72,725,730,23,230,88,92 were pieces of crap
: as compared to it.The venus 178 was better
: than the valjoux but it didn't have the
: criteria to match and be compared with
: lemania
: The speedies won easily gainst the most
: prestigious rivals including the Daytona
: 6238.
: The speedy is not without reason a great watch
: and even with a 1861 which is the best cam
: oeprated top of the range handwound
: movement, the speedy is still the best.
Georges, Could you give a review of the new James Bond watch. thank you.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |