The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Falon- 2 thoughts-
1)20 years is a long time, IF neither watch ever needs any service other than regular maintenence it'll take that long to about make up the price difference. But if you'd invest the difference and did really well......
2)Despite what some Dealers will tell you, watches are not a good investment. The cost of ownership may well equal the price you paid for the watch in 15 or 20 years. If this is that big an issue with you buy Japanese. A new seiko quartz every 2 or 3 years will keep great time- no service costs, just plunk down $200 for a new one. But you will never LOVE your Seiko, and that's the reason people pay a premium for a swiss watch like Omega.
So buy the one YOU LIKE BEST, they have different 'personalities'. In about a month you will love it and by the time it needs service you'll pay it with only a slight grumble, and I bet you'll have another Omega by then too!
Don
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |