The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Yeah, and the 'reviewer' was from
: www.ROLEXreference.com.........
: Just some info.... But you probably already
: knew everything he had to say.
: And yes, I also agree with you on the looks.
: The BroardArrow is definately has a more
: modern and sportier look to it than the
: Daytona.
: But the Rolex has a better movement, no?
Based on what I've been able to decipher from what I've read on numerous sites, yes, the Rolex 4130 is the better movement. Then again, for $6500, it SHOULD be the better movement.
I have seen a few of these at local dealers, though none in all stainless. They are nice watches, but they look just a bit too plain for me. They also lack a date function, which is something I would insist on having in a $6500 watch. That's another reason I prefer the Broad Arrow....it just LOOKS better and has a date function.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |