The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: How does a brand new Omega quartz compare to a
: vintage [mint 60`s-70`s]]automatic Omega in
: terms of something going awry??
: Are quartz considered more robust??shockproof??
: A new auto in the style I would want is out of
: budget,so I mention these two specifically.
I can't speak about vintage Omegas since I have never owned any, but as a general rule a quartz watch is more durable. Automatics have lots of small, delicate parts inside of them, and even though they are protected to some degree against shock, they aren't as "bulletproof" as quartz watches. So, if you are looking for something that is cheaper, more durable, and keeps better time, go with the quartz. If you want a little mechanical marvel on your wrist, go with the automatic.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |