The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Ask any experienced watchmaker about the eta 2892-2 and the older Omega Eta based calibers like the 1109,1110 and 1111. These movements are just engraved etas with no improvements and they need a service every 5 years and their winding system (a rotor ball system) is not better than the jeweled pivot system found on the old ones. I see the eta 2892-2 almost everywhere, it is just a mass produced movement, with a poor finish, poor over the long run accuracy (every 5 years it needs a service) and low power reserve (only 42hours).
Older inhouse Omega movements didn't and don't need a service every 5 years unlike Etas and they have better over the long run accuracy than etas. Eta manufactures cheap and affordable movements but no movements that can play in the same ground than the piguet 1150, lemania 8810 or rolex 3135.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |