: I've been reviewing your posts. It seems you
: only come out to attack people. Why not
: contribute something. If you are not a Patek
: expert , how valuable can your advice be? It
: is just an unfounded opinion. If you owned a
: Patek, maybe you could speak from
: experience. You just have a bad case of RE
: (Rolex Envy). Anyone who defends Rolex gets
: attacked by you. Often in a juvenile way.
: I always find what Georges writes informative.
: I have learned a lot from his posts and
: those of John R and other regulars. What you
: write is another issue. Equilibrium 101 is
: not very well balanced.
: Maybe you could take the time to explain why a
: Patek and a Rolex are not in the same luxury
: category and transpose that backwards to
: other watches.
I do not need to write an long essay to explain anything that may satisfy you anyhow. Rolex envy??? --I don't think so!! Are you an expert on watch movements????If not, they you're NOT in the the position to tell me to explain any of my views. For your info, I have read some lietrature on this subject and I'm not as juvenile as you may think. ANd BTW, EVERYONE here knows that Georges has a biased opinion when it comes to Rolexes. YOu need to get off your high horse and admit that in reality you're the one with the problem--Mr. Rolex!