The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Hi
: Yes what I was saying was that the 2500 had a
: better regulating accuracy system. I too
: have read it can be adjusted to 5seconds of
: accuracy per month something that did and do
: the 3035 and 3135 calibers from Rolex
: introduced respectively 23 and 12 years
: before Omega introduced the Coaxial while
: being not a coaxial movements.A coxial can't
: be judged as accurate after 3 or 5 years but
: after 15 years of daily wearing.
: Generally calibers are judged as fully reliable
: after 15 years of testing and production and
: if they never had a single issue.
: best regards
: gorges
Excellent. I have yet to see you go five posts in two Omega forums without bashing ETA movements, or bringing up Rolex.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |