The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Triangle at 12:00 does not line up

Have my 2531.80 here on the desk in front of me, face sitting flat (as best I can, given the deployant clasp). I'm gonna say that I'm "pretty sure" that the bezel lines up w/ the dial markers here.

The trouble w/ having two eyes is remembering to keep one closed, getting sure about centering the open eye above the center arbor, glancing left and right to make sure I'm seeing the case sides at the same angle....

Given the choice between keeping the watch and having the bezel re-aligned (as John notes), I'd leave the bezel alone. Too much to be potentially compromised, in my opinion, versus the opportunity for gain (more closely aligned bezel, "not a big deal" in your book).

My AD has a 10-day "no questions asked" return policy; and a 14-day exchange policy. When I bought my 2254.50, the diver's extension wasn't perfectly aligned, and that would have been enough for me to have it replaced (if it didn't have to go back for precision accuracy issues).

More generally, I gotta tell you that I tend to be on the side of those who demand these watches perform according to their reputation. That's the only way we all benefit from a rising value proposition.

Thanks for bringing this up.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE