The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I am an avid omega collector and many of my watches date from the 40's, my question is as I have maintainance done on the watches, ( lubed, timed etc). should I have the faces refurbished as well. I have had great results with other watches and having a redone face really made the watch stand out. I am also an antique gun collecttor, where it is absolutely taboo to re-blue, or otherwise restore the firearm as it destroys the collector value. some wear and tear is desirible on these guns as it adds to the sense of for lack of a better word antiqueness. So what is the general consensus. should I have the faces look restored to their original out-of-the-box brand new condition on a 60-70 year old watch, or are collectors looking fot signs of age that are
appropriate to the era?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |