![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
No,the criticism against the Breitling calibre b17 was fully justified and isn't exagerated neither overexagerated.
The 2824 was never a high quality and very top of the range movement. It was always refered as a middle of the range product and it will always be, it is the cheapest automatic movement of the eta range. The long term accuracy of the 2824 is not that great and not as stable as compared to the 2892a-2. I have seen some vintage watches fitted with a 2824 like the old eternas kontiki and they were keeping horrible time.
My 1951 seamaster keeps more than perfect time with a bumper automatic movement that was serviced 4 times in 54 years accuracy is +1/+2 sec per day.
Breitling was never known for the greatness of its movements as compared to Omega which was a true watch manufacture manufacturing its own movements till 1984.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |