The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Further thoughts on the 1610-930 bracelet

: After commenting directly and more extensively
: to your original Post, Ray, I wanted to add
: some thoughts to John's valuable
: contribution here.

: I also own the 2254.50 SeMPC, on the 1610-930
: bracelet. However, although it is the same
: year as my 2531.80 on the 1503-825 bracelet
: (the subject of your question, Ray), there
: are a number of differences that go to your
: Post.

: 1. Lettering on the Bond bracelet has the
: square-shaped "O" in
: "Professional," and the 1610-930
: has the round-shaped "O" (like
: your earlier Bond bracelet).

: 2. Part number "930" appears to be
: stamped, off to the side, on the 1610-930
: braclet end-link, as on your original
: 1503-825 bracelet. Again, "825" is
: centered and appears to be laser-etched on
: my new Bond bracelet.

: Additionally (and I'm not sure if this is a
: good thing in terms of options, or a bad
: thing in terms of continuity), its hard to
: say if lettering on the 1503-825 and
: 1610-930 bracelets is comparable. The
: face-length on the deployant clasp for each
: is the same (36mm), but the Bond clasp is
: 20mm wide, and the clasp on the 1610-930 is
: 18mm wide.

I appreciate all the feedback. I've contacted Omega in NJ and they have asked me to forward hi res pics to them which I did this morning. I'll keep you informed on their response.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE