The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: About that 2531.80 thing again

: Your thoughts about the $1000 and risk
: vis-a-vis marketing the entire line are the
: same as mine, Keith.

: In terms of there still being a 2531.80 (c1120)
: manufactured after April, that may well be
: so. But in terms of there also being an
: "updated" 2531.80 w/ co-axial
: movement, the word I got from a source I
: consider very reliable was
: "certain."

: Putting my marketing hat back on, given that
: fact, the "risk" then becomes: Do
: you keep the old 2531.80 along w/ the
: co-axial version?

: Doubt it....

Personally, I think this is a bad idea if it is indeed true. First of all, a co-axial 2531.80 will cost well over $3000 as Keith pointed out. Second, those of us with current "used" Bond SMPs will have watches worth perhaps $1000 at most if we sold them privately. So, are we willing to spend 4 figures more for the exact same watch just because it has the co-axial escapement? I really doubt it.

I think Omega should leave the current SMPs alone and focus on creating new models with the co-axial escapement. It just doesn't make a lot of financial sense (or marketing sense) to produce the exact same watch with an upgraded movement and slap a $1000 premium on it. Heck, with my dealer's discount it only cost a bit over $1300 for the last SMP I bought. Now I'm going to shell out $1000 more for a co-axial variant of the same watch I own??? I think not.

Only my two cents....

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE