The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: What made you suspect it might not be genuine?
: It looks obviously authentic to me.
There were three things that caused me concern.
1) the "825" number on each end piece was engraved in the middle of the link instead of at the end like most bracelets I've seen.
2) The bracelet number etching on the underside of the clasp was much fainter than on previous bracelets. I learned that they are now acid etched as opposed to lazer engraving in the past.
3) The engraving on the outside of the clasp is not as deep as in the past and several letters look different.
Omega confirmed that these are the newest run of the Seamaster bracelet and is correct.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |