The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: First, in terms of longevity, keep in mind that
: Omega has a business in and of itself that
: it dedicated to restoring its older watches.
: Has parts, expertise. So, that's something
: that comes w/ Omega.
: Second, nothing lasts forever. It's always a
: matter of care, maintenance, and repair.
: Always trade-offs, too. Quartz may be more
: accurate, but if your seals leak, absolutely
: intolerant of getting wet: Whole mechanism
: replaced to "bring it back" (tho'
: at less expense than a mechanical movement),
: et cetera .
I acknowledge that there are very few things that last forever. I do, however, tend to take very good care of my things. My car is 12 years old now and still running well. A watch would be no different for me.
: Third, I've already shared w/ you my thoughts
: on how reliable a co-axial movement that has
: not been on the market that long will be ten
: years from now. Not that I am
: "worried" about it; just that, as
: a cost-of-upkeep consideration, I don't
: think that's fully known. Status? Yeah, I
: think it has more status than my 1120
: caliber.
I know little about the co-axial movement. It however is the movement on one of the watches I am interested in. It is not a deal breaker as to me as long as the watch works well, and is an Omega I am good to go. I am not concerned with status as I said before.
: But I'm gonna pay $300 for a complete service
: every 4 years on my 2254.50, and at 10 years
: that works out to be (um, 4 goes into
: 10...?) $750 per decade. How much more are
: you paying for the co-axial movement, which
: is then due for maintenance in 2016?
The maintance of fine watches is something I am not knowledgable about yet. I'm not sure when it should be done, what they do, and how much that costs.
: Fourth, I'm all well and good w/ owning a watch
: you love forever. But remember, I'm a
: divorce counselor: Folks don't keep spouses
: more than 7 years on average (partially due
: to lack of proper maintenance, but that's a
: side issue). As yourself what you have today
: that you had 15 years ago that you're
: passionate about perpetuating.
: Some of us here who love our "Bond"
: Seamasters from the last three 007 movies
: are keeping an eye wide open for what sort
: of Omega James Bond will be wearing in
: Casino Royale . And we'll get it. And, you
: know, maybe that will become our new
: favorite for the next 10 years.
: Be honest: If you owned an original 105.012
: Speedmaster with the 321 caliber movement, I
: can see that being "the" watch for
: you, and you saying, "this is the same
: watch Neil Armstrong took to the moon."
: But, ten years from now, you're gonna be
: wearing a "Bond" Seamaster and
: saying, "this is the same watch as the
: guy two actors ago wore in 3 of the 007
: films"? Or, "yeah, that new
: tri-axial movement may be nice, but I'm
: sticking w/ the co-axial that's been tried
: and true since the turn of the
: Millenium"?
I think what you are getting at here is something we must all come to terms with. I can't with any certainty say that what I like today is what I'm going to like tomorrow. That said, I am certain that if I get a watch today that I really want (not need, let's not be foolish)and I maintain it and wear it everyday it will become part of my "style" as so many things have in my life. Omegas are not the only watch I desire and truth be known I will not collect watches, I can only wear one. But deciding on a brand is something I set out to do early in the watch search now allows me to focus on the different models within the brand.
: Finally, you made mention of watching your
: mechanisms. You know, there are Omega
: watches w/ "display" backs, right?
: So you may want to consider expanding your
: look at least for now to see if any of those
: grab you.
I don't need anything like a display back, because I will always have the watch on. Just like I don't need or want a chronograph. I think what I need to do now is actually go try on some Omega watches at the local ADs here in DFW. I haven't put on an Omega watch yet and one of the Seamaster 300 Divers might be to big for me. And if it comes to the point that I can't find one that feels right from Omega, I will just have to find another brand. Time is something I have plenty of.
Brett
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |