The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Hi
: Omega is relatively good value for money. But
: its vintage models keep a far better value
: than new ones.
: Omega despite using non inhouse movements is
: the second most recognized brand after
: Rolex. However the problems that happened
: with the Broad Arrows should take your
: attention and think twice before the
: purchase. I think that the price increase is
: mainly due to marketing and advertising
: costs.
: I would go for a vintage pre 1967 speedmaster
: with a 321 caliber which is the best chrono
: you can get in my opinion.
: Wishing you all the best for your next
: purchase.
: regards
: georges
thanks for your comments on this subject Georges,
even after all my concerns about the ETA movements in Omega watches, i still much prefer the omega design direction compared to Rolex.
again, re your comments, what happened with the Broad Arrow watches ?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |