The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: I disagree with you for these reasons

: Rolex is a manufacture and Omega isn't a
: manufacture anymore an Omega doesn't
: manufacture and built the movements itself
: as it used to do in the past.I have rarely
: seen a watch with an eta based movement
: keeping very high values as Rolex. Marketing
: is one thing but manufacture status is
: another one.Compare vintage Omegas prices
: and new Omegas prices for sale on the used
: market, you will probably see what I am
: meaning.

I think manufacture status really means

a) There are fewer of the movements, which make them more exclusive and desirable
b) The implication is that the company stands more solidly behind their product, theoretically having a greater incentive to watch quality control, resolve movement issues etc.

While there is certainly not much against the first argument, I'm not so sure that the second can objectively be made. However, the perception is there, and perception IS reality.

In looking at the Rolex vs. ETA movements, I would say there are probably refinements in the Rolex movements that make them worth maybe $300 more. In my opinion, they're not worth $2000 more.

Then again, the portion of the cost attributable to the movement is small compared to that of the rest of the watch.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE